In April I joined a dozen women from my Harvard Business School class for dinner at a Mexican food restaurant. Given that we graduated twenty years ago, we spent the 1st hour of dinner re-acquainting ourselves with one another. We quickly fell into formal – or not so formal – introductions. I was so surprised by how few of my peers were working in a full-time traditional career – 2 out of 12. A few more had worked a more traditional career path prior to having children but many had never worked a full-time career due to marriage, children, divorce, requirements of a spouse’s job, parental care, etc., etc. Most chose part-time work at some point. Only three of us, including yours truly, worked full-time after having children.
One woman described her vocational interests as “design & architecture.” It sounded exciting and creative but I remember being profoundly sad by the way she described it. “I should never have gone to business school,” was her opening line. She talked about a circuitous path to finding her interest in residential design & architecture. Her commentary was almost apologetic.
Prior to the dinner I wish I’d read Sylvia Ann Hewlett’s wonderful Off-Ramps and On-Ramps: Keeping Talented Women on the Road to Success. Ms. Hewlett’s rich vocabulary and thoughtful frameworks would have been a wonderful filter to assist me as I processed the very real women’s transition issues present at the table that night. More importantly I could have shared her insights with this lovely women who had moved into the “shouldn’t have” pit. Have you ever been there? Even for a short stint? Hewlett offers a radically different approach.
At the book’s core Hewlett posits a “white male career” model as inconsistent with the needs and objectives of most female workers. She follows that women’s career interests are typically non-linear, or lacking the continuous, full-time characteristics of the male career.
She assesses women’s progress at a phased, macro level. In her view Phase 1 was achieved as women became as credentialed as men. She offers compelling statistics on the % graduating college; % with graduate degrees; etc. Phase 2 is all about understanding the needs and wants of women so that we can begin to fathom why we are still under-represented in top roles across all industries. Her discussion of the Phase 2 drivers for women’s career decisions was the most informed and well-written I’ve read yet.
Here are a few Phase 2 tidbits:
- She conducted primary research and found that a woman’s ambition falls precipitously as she ages; 53% described themselves as extremely or highly ambitious in the 28-40 year old age group versus only 37% for those in the 41 and higher category. (Off-ramps & On-ramps, pg 49)
- Her research also revealed that women’s career wants differ greatly from those of men. For example, the top three career attributes for women in Hewlett’s sample were: high quality colleagues; to ‘be themselves’ at work; and flexibility. More than fifty percent of the women in her sample wanted a career that allowed them to give back to society. (Off-ramps & On-ramps, pg 51)
- Hewlett also makes the case for women’s networks. “Networks boost confidence and create traction by connecting women to peers, provide access to role models, showcase leadership skills, and expand business relationships.” (Off-ramps & On-ramps, pg 180) On this one I have to state my bias – I believe women’s networks are invaluable for almost every frame of life.
Hewlett wrote this wonderful book following an article by the same name that appeared in the Harvard Business Review in 2005. I read the article then. I got so much more out of this book now — what with two kids and an extreme job under my belt. Hewlett has a running – at times funny – commentary throughout the book on extreme jobs: defined as well paid; sixty+ hours per week; and attributes like travel, responsibilities for profit & loss, or work-related events outside of regular work hours.
While there are no answers in this book I found it to be very worthwhile. I leave it with a new set of vocabulary – my “non-linear” career – and some comfort that I’m not alone as I pivot away from ambition and towards changing the world. Anyone with me?
© 2011 NovoFemina.com – All rights reserved. No content on this site may be reused in any fashion without written permission from NovoFemina.com.
As always, I loved your review, and will definitely have to read this book. Many of the points resonated for me as I know they would for so many women in my circle. I think the ‘workplace structure’ that women have felt they need to either adapt to – or opt out of – is in need of major need of renovation. Maybe your friend can help us with a new design!
I’m downloading the book on my Nook tonight Linda! Thanks for the highlights.
[…] with my friend – is due to the absence of any maps or models with which to draw upon. As in Hewlett’s On Ramps & Off Ramps and Beck’s Steering by Starlight Fels compels women to imagine themselves into their […]
Sounds good! On the days when, I too feel like apologizing for taking the money and the time for business school and then going “non-linear”- I may look on this book for some affirmation. I have found that my professional ambition has become more balanced with personal ambition as I have gotten older, but I have not become less ambitious. I think that is an important poing and I’ll read to see if the book makes it.
[…] careers models: (Off Ramps) Ah, a new vocabulary phrase for me: the white male linear career model. We live in a […]
[…] From my humble perspective there is a group of women for whom the easy choice is to stay at home. It seems to me that this group somehow never engaged their spirit in their work life prior to children. Therefore the prospect of returning to a marginally interesting job — with the added complexities and economics of child care — rarely makes sense. My view is that FEW would stay home IF we had the opportunity to engage our spirit in our vocation AND work with the flexibility that fit our other priorities. Would you agree? I think at least 50% of this is right. Deloitte offers flex time to all employees. A significant amount of their professionals take part, including many many men. (Sylvia Ann Hewlett – On Ramps & Off Ramps). […]
[…] I’m a far better parent (I think) & person now than when I was battling between an extreme job and a parenting role. In my pre-transition state I thought I was “on” but in fact I […]
[…] in any real sense. Wasn’t I more at risk to losing what is important to me when I worked an extreme job? Towards the end of my last 4.5 year gig my daughter was being bullied at school. I was so […]
[…] a coffee almost two years ago. I was on the cusp of transition; going from a full-time ‘extreme‘ job into a consulting status for the same company. Truth be told I was somewhat […]
[…] daughter who has special needs has been a substantial focus for her and her husband.. who has an extreme job that requires more than a bit of […]
[…] out to be men-in-skirts albeit with better educational credentials. Sylvia Ann Hewlett, author of Off-Ramps and On-Ramps: Keeping Talented Women on the Road to Success, wrote that “a “white male career” model as inconsistent with the needs and objectives of […]
[…] of consistent observation for me to notice what had been an on-going problem for more than a year. Extreme job […]
[…] remember early on being struck by research contained in Sylvia Ann Hewlett’s Off-Ramps and On-Ramps: Keeping Talented Women on the Road to Success. She shared that 53% of women described themselves as extremely or highly ambitious in the 28-40 […]
[…] when I decided, ‘hey, I think I’ll transition.’ When I pivoted away from an extreme job I knew that my journey would take me in an entirely new direction. But transition? The word […]